Ink & A Stick

The ramblings of a man who should know better.

Tottenham v. Liverpool: The choice of a new generation

By George Ogier

The corner of Twitter in which football blogging exists is an easy world to get caught up in. It is slightly removed from the real world and the word “news” has a different meaning. The rest of the planet is dealing with horrific scenes from Egypt and a desperation of certain people to have complete transparency in government.

Over in the football blogging suburb of social media we’re laughing at a terrible song from Spurs fans and an irate Gooner having a breakdown outside the Emirates stadium whilst nearly crying at the mention of John Cross. The central theme of this odd but hilarious outpouring is Arsenal’s lack of activity in the transfer market.

Once more pressure is being heaped on Arsene Wenger as his side looked ill-prepared for another season in the Premier League. Wenger himself recently asked assembled journalists who he should buy. The master of the transfer bargain appears to have run out of ideas.

FIFATransArsenal and Wenger are far from the only ones having transfer trouble this season. David Moyes seems to have adopted a buying strategy straight out of the FIFA 13 coaching manual whilst Liverpool’s Brendan Rodgers is finding himself in a fight with rival clubs for the same players and losing out.

The problems facing these three coaches and in particular Rodgers and Wenger are being met with frustration and disappointment, particularly from the fans who worry that their clubs are stagnating. This is brought into sharper focus by the dealings of the board at Tottenham Hotspur.

So far this summer Spurs have added to their squad in impressive style. Midfielders Paulinho and Etienne Capoue have been a clear upgrade on the departing Tom Huddlestone and Scott Parker. Attackers Nacer Chadli and Roberto Soldado give a Tottenham side too reliant on Gareth Bale some diversity up front.

One could argue that all four of Tottenham’s signings would have strengthened both Arsenal and Liverpool so why wasn’t there more competition for the contracts of these new arrivals? In the case of Arsenal it appears to be purely down to money and the reticence to part with it. As for Liverpool it seems that the reds simply aren’t the draw they once were.

Arsenal, Liverpool and Spurs currently all have the same ambition. They are fighting for the fourth Champions League spot and of the “also-rans” outside the top three they seem the best equipped to get it. This means that the clubs have similar transfer targets. They can’t attract the real blue chip stars so are scrapping for the players just below that level.

This Supermarket Sweep-style bun fight has led to the clubs being in direct competition for the services of certain players. In recent times the short arm, deep pocket approach of Arsene Wenger has left Spurs and Liverpool competing in the name of player acquisition. Last summer it was Gylfi Sigurdsson and Clint Dempsey. This year’s tug-of-love centre piece is Willian, the playmaker/winger from Brazil.

As in the case of Sigurdsson and Dempsey it looks like Spurs are in position to win the race for Willian. This has prompted some Liverpool fans to accuse Spurs of hijacking transfer deals and lazily poaching prospects from the reds’ scouting policy.

Both claims are ludicrous. Regular viewers of Match Of The Day during the 2011/12 season would have noted the abilities of Sigurdsson and Dempsey. Similarly you only had to be vaguely aware of the Champions League over the last two years to have heard of Willian. The fact that Liverpool keep missing out on potential buys does send reality crashing through the doors of Anfield. History is not enough to attract big name players.

Nobody with any sense would suggest that Spurs are bigger than Liverpool. Indeed, the 18-time champions of England are one of the two biggest clubs in the country alongside Manchester United. However, recent transfer dealings have left the club open to questions about Liverpool’s standing in the game.

WillianAnzIt isn’t just Tottenham that are beating Brendan Rodgers to the punch. Earlier this summer the Armenian sensation Henrikh Mkhitaryan chose Borussia Dortmund over Anfield when a move to the north-west seemed almost nailed on. A side who once took Champions league football for granted now don’t even have the diminished allure of the Europa League with which to tempt players.

In fairness to Liverpool this summer has been an almost perfect storm for Spurs. They have been sitting on money that chairman Daniel Levy didn’t trust Harry Redknapp with and there are funds from the inevitable Gareth Bale deal to push further purchases forward. Deals that might have been carved out over two or three seasons are all happening in one window.

Spurs are currently a far more attractive proposition for players looking to join a team with potential. Tottenham have finished above Liverpool for the past four seasons and twice in the top four during those years. Liverpool may have countless league titles and European cups but that means little in the eyes of a modern player. If history was a lure Nottingham Forest would have beaten Manchester City to the signings of Stevan Jovetic and Alvaro Negredo.

As with most sports, football is cyclical and no doubt the order of things will change again. Not so long ago Liverpool were signing Fernando Torres, one of the most sought after players in Europe. At the same time Spurs were buying Darren Bent and the rubbish Gilberto.

As it stands Spurs and Liverpool are 5th and 6th favourites to finish fourth this season. Brendan Rodgers is building a more than capable side at Anfield and Stoke City won’t be the only ones leaving the red half of Merseyside empty-handed this season. The reality of the situation is that currently Spurs are simply a better team and that alone is reason for players to choose Tottenham over Liverpool.


Single Post Navigation

6 thoughts on “Tottenham v. Liverpool: The choice of a new generation

  1. I suppose there’s always going to be one thing to pick out from a report or blog, and here’s my pick. Quote : ‘If history was a lure Nottingham Forest would have beaten Manchester City to the signings of Stevan Jovetic and Alvaro Negredo’ <– For that, absolute nonsense, mate. No comparison, that was thirty flipin' years ago they were revered, nearly 2 generations away.. Anyhoot, I believe you're not far off with this piece. I may add that It was only in 2008/9 we (LFC) were voted by UEFA as No.1 in Europe.

    • That’s fair enough. My point is that some people seem to think that Liverpool’s history should be enough of a draw to players and that simply isn’t the case any more. I appreciate you taking time to read. Many thanks.

  2. I think our “failings” in the transfer market this summer have been blown way out of proportion. Mkhitaryan went to the CL finalists and one of the strongest teams in Europe currently, no shame in missing out there. LFC were offered the chance to up their bid for Willian (according to Tony Barrett) and declined. Spurs have got 90mil burning a hole in their pocket, not many clubs not in the CL have that kind of spending power and the player is probably worth 35mil to their team. After the Carroll / Downing debacle, I think FSG are wary about paying over the odds for any player.

    We can talk about who’s better etc, but personally I think Spurs are just in a uniquely strong financial position at the moment and that’s the true differentiating factor.

    • All good points, well made. Liverpool and Spurs seem to both have a sensationalist element attached to their dealings due to past transfers. I find the switch in fortunes interesting compared to five or six years ago. Thanks for reading and also taking the time to comment.

  3. Great article, and almost a surprise to read something so well written that I would expect from the newspapers who are more concerned with writing rubbish.

    As an LFC fan, I only believe a player has signed when he’s photographed in a shirt, not what is written any more, as the Mkhitaryan fiasco highlighted so well (Russian journalists saying he was good as gold)

    In any event, as fans we get a bit too caught up in a false reality and think clubs can just buy anyone buy clicking their fingers. Liverpool have almost fixed the mess the last two clowns in charge created, and if things keep heading the same way, I see good things for us in the next few years.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: